[RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS

Mon May 18 21:35:21 PDT 2009

Where is the flaming ball in my statement?

Scott T. Bowers
www.scottsrockets.com <http://www.scottsrockets.com/> 

  _____  

From: Bill Munds [mailto:appusher at q.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:32 PM
To: Scott T. Bowers; Wilkerson2; rockets at rocketsnw.com
Subject: RE: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS

Could you all throw flaming balls at each other off-list?

Thanks

 <http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=EML_WLHM_GreaterGood> i'm
EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD
Join me	

> From: scott at scottsrockets.com
> To: jim at jmw29221.com; rockets at rocketsnw.com
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:24:00 -0700
> Subject: Re: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
> 
> And secondly, this administration did not do anything. The good rocketeers
> who donated, the various board members who kept the lawsuit going, our
> brilliant legal team that took the fight to them, and our members who
acted
> as expert witnesses are the one who did this. They put the BATFE in a lose
> lose situation. The BATFE did not give up, they were beat. 
> 
> 
> Scott T. Bowers
> www.scottsrockets.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rockets-bounces at rocketsnw.com [mailto:rockets-bounces at rocketsnw.com]
> On Behalf Of jim at jmw29221.com
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: rockets at rocketsnw.com
> Subject: Re: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
> Importance: Low
> 
> Paul, sounds like you're all for appeasement. Worked real well for Neville
> Chamberlain prior to the start of WWII; you should probably ask the
> Sudetenland Czechs how they feel about it. And while we're on political
> rants, don't forget about Senator DICK Schumer; a flaming yellow liberal
to
> the core, who put on that disgusting press conference/scare tactic and who
> also torpedoed Senator Enzi's attempt to provide us with some relief via
> legislation. So shove that with your personal liberty party trash.
> 
> Give me a break - you toss out garbage like you did and "I would ask out
of
> politeness that no responses be made" - get over yourself and go back to
RMR
> where you belong.
> 
> And try enjoy the freedoms that others have fought to obtain for you
instead
> of offering to turn around and give them up. 
> 
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 20:47:05 -0700, "Robert Krausert"
> <lawndart.robert at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Paul,
> > I'm not going comment. Seriously not in agreement.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Robert
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <jhadv at pacifier.com>
> > To: <rockets at rocketsnw.com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 8:33 PM
> > Subject: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
> > 
> > 
> >> This was my point when suggesting negotiation. By taking APCP off 
> >> the list of regulated substances all restrictions go away with the 
> >> caveat of state law or other applicable statute. Conveyance, storage 
> >> all of that is gone. But the point I wanted to make in this e-mail 
> >> is what Administration did this? The Bush administration fought you 
> >> tooth and toenail to restrict your liberties. The Obama 
> >> administration dropped
> the
> >> entire regulation without a fight. Kind of makes one wonder what 
> >> party is actually better in practice for personal liberty. But a 
> >> caveat, I personally think Obama is a whore to the banks and I think 
> >> he pursues a policy of accommodation to everyone with the intent of 
> >> obfuscating the fact that he is creating a ruling oligarchy in the 
> >> form of the financial class. I disagree with this policy more than I 
> >> can say but at least he threw us a bone. I also hope that this makes 
> >> it past the rocket list censors and would ask out of politeness that 
> >> no responses be made. Just my opinion, which, ain't worth much.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rockets mailing list
> >> Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> >> http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rockets mailing list
> > Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> > http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
> _______________________________________________
> Rockets mailing list
> Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rockets mailing list
> Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
> 

-------------- next part --------------
Where is the flaming ball in my statement?

Scott T. Bowers
http://www.scottsrockets.com/ www.scottsrockets.com

From:
Bill Munds [mailto:appusher at q.com]
Sent:
Monday, May 18, 2009 9:32 PM
To:
Scott T. Bowers; Wilkerson2; rockets at rocketsnw.com
Subject:
RE: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
Could you all throw flaming balls at each other off-list?

Thanks
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=EML_WLHM_GreaterGood http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w3/ltr/i_charity.gif EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD
Join me

> From: scott at scottsrockets.com
> To: jim at jmw29221.com; rockets at rocketsnw.com
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:24:00 -0700
> Subject: Re: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
>
> And secondly, this administration did not do anything. The good rocketeers
> who donated, the various board members who kept the lawsuit going, our
> brilliant legal team that took the fight to them, and our members who acted
> as expert witnesses are the one who did this. They put the BATFE in a lose
> lose situation. The BATFE did not give up, they were beat.
>
>
> Scott T. Bowers
> www.scottsrockets.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rockets-bounces at rocketsnw.com [mailto:rockets-bounces at rocketsnw.com]
> On Behalf Of jim at jmw29221.com
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: rockets at rocketsnw.com
> Subject: Re: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
> Importance: Low
>
> Paul, sounds like you're all for appeasement. Worked real well for Neville
> Chamberlain prior to the start of WWII; you should probably ask the
> Sudetenland Czechs how they feel about it. And while we're on political
> rants, don't forget about Senator DICK Schumer; a flaming yellow liberal to
> the core, who put on that disgusting press conference/scare tactic and who
> also torpedoed Senator Enzi's attempt to provide us with some relief via
> legislation. So shove that with your personal liberty party trash.
>
> Give me a break - you toss out garbage like you did and "I would ask out of
> politeness that no responses be made" - get over yourself and go back to RMR
> where you belong.
>
> And try enjoy the freedoms that others have fought to obtain for you instead
> of offering to turn around and give them up.
>
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 20:47:05 -0700, "Robert Krausert"
> <lawndart.robert at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Paul,
> > I'm not going comment. Seriously not in agreement.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Robert
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <jhadv at pacifier.com>
> > To: <rockets at rocketsnw.com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 8:33 PM
> > Subject: [RocketsNW] HAVING FUN WITH OUR GOOD FRIEND DENNIS
> >
> >
> >> This was my point when suggesting negotiation. By taking APCP off
> >> the list of regulated substances all restrictions go away with the
> >> caveat of state law or other applicable statute. Conveyance, storage
> >> all of that is gone. But the point I wanted to make in this e-mail
> >> is what Administration did this? The Bush administration fought you
> >> tooth and toenail to restrict your liberties. The Obama
> >> administration dropped
> the
> >> entire regulation without a fight. Kind of makes one wonder what
> >> party is actually better in practice for personal liberty. But a
> >> caveat, I personally think Obama is a whore to the banks and I think
> >> he pursues a policy of accommodation to everyone with the intent of
> >> obfuscating the fact that he is creating a ruling oligarchy in the
> >> form of the financial class. I disagree with this policy more than I
> >> can say but at least he threw us a bone. I also hope that this makes
> >> it past the rocket list censors and would ask out of politeness that
> >> no responses be made. Just my opinion, which, ain't worth much.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rockets mailing list
> >> Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> >> http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rockets mailing list
> > Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> > http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
> _______________________________________________
> Rockets mailing list
> Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rockets mailing list
> Rockets at rocketsnw.com
> http://mx1.blastzone.com/mailman/listinfo/rockets
>